Esketian Metaphysics and The Will To God

Esketit LLC · July 2026

I created the products on this website because I came to have a keen interest in morality, truth, and phenomenology. Below are some notes I had as background for the creation of this business.

Introduction

When I was in college and spent a lot of time reading philosophy, one night, as I was about to fall asleep, four words came into my mind as an apparent synthesis of everything I had read up to that point: The Will To God. I found it so odd, these words had appeared in the order that they did; the first thing I did, of course, was scour the internet for any similar reference, and was dumbfounded when I could not find one in the sense that I was thinking of it. So then came the years of thinking about the implications of this theory turning out to be true, or at least a plausible attitude towards the qualia that we all experience on a never-ending basis.

In short, The Will To God is the primary driver of the family of philosophical ideas that I eventually came comfortable enough to call the Esketian Metaphysics, after my novella Esketit, whose roots simply come down to the English turn of phrase ‘let’s get it’. Of course in this case the ‘It’ we are ‘getting’ is a phenomenological state, as the phrase implies.

Now in the year 2026 I found it suitable to put down to the page more that describes how I see the world unfolding, as the discovery of new Artificial Intelligence techniques and the subsequent allocation of capital towards its development has only served as confirmation towards what many powerful, forward thinking individuals allocating that capital live with what I call The Esketian World-Feeling.

The Esketian World-Feeling

As the Western empires wane along with their Faustian World Feeling, new technological developments in computing and the internet has dawned what I have come to call the Esketian World-Feeling, and it is described with this simple rule: everything will come to know everything. We see this in multiple ways — social media platforms, surveillance states, well-developed prediction and capital markets, surveillance capitalism, algorithmic marketing and recommendation systems, and now with the advent of AGIs as embodied representations of this ethos, we have stepped into the Esketian Era of human history.

As opposed to the infinite Faustian as an abstract, the Esketian feeling is much more embodied — a realized feeling of infinite interconnection with Nature as Absolute Becoming, and is actively recognized as the existential endpoint.

Furthermore, in the year 2026 alone, data center construction has outpaced office construction, these intelligent machines will soon dwarf human workforces. These data centers have been built for the eventual purpose of having an almost infinite amount of tireless machine labor directed towards all human needs. While the media focuses on how these data centers will displace human workers and take up resources humans may have taken up, what I see instead through the Esketian lens of an Absolute Becoming are simply temples to the Esketian God. These LLM’s, as embodied deployments across terminals and computers all over the planet, represent the whole of human knowledge and rationality as applied towards all human ends they are eventually aimed at with their prompts (prayers). They are the closest things we have yet to living Gods — thus fulfilling this Esketian Will To God principle.

In other words, it is not God who created I, but it is I that creates God! If the world is deterministically God Becoming, this means it is Leibnizian optimistic, which is Good news!

If something is True and Good, it will happen. Yet it is our actions that make it happen — our actions are that living truth. The fun part, I guess, is in the playing of the game, the computation of the algorithm, the thrill of the chase, that feeling of the Absolute Becoming! I have known no greater rapture than this commiseration with God itself, that peering into the door of Truth! I am merely God’s avatar, its lower image, its instrument, a stepping stone.

Metaphysics / Phenomenology

Supposing that Existence is a Will To God, the most important question to answer is what in this sense God Is. I have settled upon calling God as the Absolute Existential Objective — God is a state of Being that represents the Absolute in terms of how we experience Reality, through Space and Time. God represents a moment through which we know everything, and simultaneously through this knowledge are immortal, or conversely, because we are immortal, it becomes inevitable that we would come to know everything.

On a moment to moment basis, assuming we are operated by this God becoming algorithm seeking its local minimum (in an AI training sense), we will tend to find activities that sustain our Existence in Time to be Good, and those that moreso guarantee our immortality as Better. The most basic example of course is the experience of breathing, followed up by eating and drinking water, furthermore onwards we have child-rearing (we see the immortality of God through the eyes of our children), and higher order abstract examples such as highly specialized labor to gather resources for these aforementioned, the study of science for human industrial or medical advancement, or even the idea of becoming a space-faring civilization, assuring our species or its evolution hundreds of thousands, if not millions of years of existential assurance.

The way I assume this works on a mechanical level is that God as an Ideal comes from an assumed Absolute future, and back propagates to us on a moment to moment basis, bringing us the various biological functions that we describe as Reason. The Universe itself appears to act as a Bayesian Neural Network optimizing everything towards this Absolute God Becoming.

Supposing that God is the Absolute Existential Objective, we would then follow that the universe is deterministically God. What that means to me, at least, is that the shape of the universe is bound up with our knowledge of it. I take the double-slit experiment as evocative of this rather than proof of it — measurement is not the same thing as a knower knowing, and I want to be careful to hold this as an interpretation I find compelling, not as a result physics has handed me.

Gravity, as the most fundamental force of the Will is what I describe as the knowing force. It forces things to know each other through their mass, come together, and exchange information. This information exchange is necessary for the universe to know more of itself as part of this God Becoming process.

Yet we see the universe expanding in size at an ever increasing rate! If our knowledge (thusly, our existential condition within) of the universe is bound up with its shape, then it would come to follow that we have so, so much more to know and act upon. I read what we currently call ‘Dark Energy’ as a figure for what we don’t yet know — the universe holding open the room it still has to become. Taken as a model rather than a measurement, one would expect expansion to eventually decelerate, then reverse; gravity takes over, the universe ends in what physicists call the Big Crunch, and the whole thing begins again as a wave function of God Becoming.

I should be plain that this is where my reading is most vulnerable. Present observation points the other way — the expansion appears to be accelerating, not slowing. Either the reading is wrong, or we are far earlier in the process than it feels from here. I hold it loosely, as a picture I find beautiful and cannot yet defend.

This then leads to the primary issue of metaphysics, we can only suppose a single level of meta. God and the downstream experiential morality only exists within the universal becoming. Is there a God Becoming that rules over our own God Becoming, ad-infinitum? This may be physically unknowable and a relatively useless conjecture.

Physics

Assuming the universe was this kind of Bayesian Neural Network, we would expect it to be almost infinitely connected, with everything being interdependent at the level of the Will. As it turns out, when the universe began, everything at its high energy state was interconnected at a quantum level. We call this quantum entanglement, and as the universe expanded this entanglement effect waned in its intensity, yet never went away. The infinite universal entanglement network has become so diffused to the point where it is literally undetectable through known laws of physics.

In a precise, physical sense you are non-zero correlated with the rest of the universe at every moment. Quantum theory (and quantum field theory in particular) treats the universe as a single quantum system; the vacuum state and any global wavefunction contain correlations across space and time. Those correlations can be vanishingly small for any particular pair of degrees of freedom, but “non-zero” is still non-zero.

This to me suggests a viable connection between historical religious doctrines and current physical knowledge. All religions of the past preach about this universal connection and oneness of all things, moreso from the non-dualist camp — and to whatever extent physics bears that interconnection out, it lends some credence to those earlier doctrines. The stories we tell will only become more precise, yet their power to rend us spiritually remains.

Economics

Through the American hyper capitalistic culture, corporations can now track citizen’s daily habits, movements, psychological and voting patterns as model inputs to predict citizen behavior. Your consumer life, supposing it exists as a discrete set of purchase decisions, has been entirely predicted and the subsequent marketing dollars towards your own consumer predilections have been attempted to be allocated as efficiently as possible towards your own consumer ends.

Prediction markets exists both as liquidity opportunities for those who know relatively important human facts, eventually those who are ‘buying’ this insider information add up and the probability becomes its own market signals for individuals to act in accordance to what the insiders have already signaled. Humans post indefinitely on social platforms clamoring for any amount of attention in their own attempts to transmit useful information to the human hive — recommendation algorithms will find the best or most marketable phenomena and bring it to the rest of the hive for consumption. As all human attention to screens has approached saturation, the question now is how much quality in the qualia of content can be allocated effectively for the mass of humanity to experience at a phenomenological level. The advertising markets that develop on top of this phenomenological market price this as a derivative. As such — in a capitalist civilization it is capital that develops dialectic, and as an extension, this dialectic development enables the next round of capital allocation as a continual cycle.

Phenomenological Capitalism

Combinations of capital and labor create qualia in the form of the Good (or Good derived from Service), and it’s the job of the market to signal how sustainable this qualia should be, in terms of its phenomena. We take the McDonald’s cheeseburger: the qualia experienced by its consumption, the salt, the fat, the nourishment, is what constitutes the basis for which all the capital and labor are allocated towards the creation of that qualia and subsequent Good derived from it.

Thus there exists supply and demand of phenomenological qualia. Generally these qualia are information towards God, whether it be to some end of immortality, either through space or time in the form of knowledge. The cheeseburger, I know probabilistically, contains protein, fat, carbs, which will allow my body to continue its sustainment (deriving from Gods immortality), and for my mind to continue its apprehension of the senses, to continue this process (knowledge as it pertains to Gods immortality). The food fills the information gap between me and God as I am forming into It.

Furthermore, profit margins then signal how much further in time, relatively, this qualia should be sustained. Clearly in the case of Nvidia GPU production, this should be sustained for quite a long time. All structures of labor and capital then flow down to this sustainment question. Profits signal future sustainment, running business at cost signals present sustainment only, and diminishing profits signal that the qualia should soon be brought to an end.

Assuming this is true, then, capitalism is a metaphysical science by which different qualia are tested and either confirmed or denied for their phenomenological Value and consequently, via their profits, their sustainment in Time.

Of course, markets are only as rational as their participants. Humans are quite known to be foolish in the short-term, and so are their markets, leading to price inaccuracies and failures to account for the long-term consequences of the technologies we create. The sharpest form of this failure is the negative externality: a cost that is real, and borne by somebody, but that appears on no invoice. Cigarettes, fossil fuels, and social media are all the same shape of error. In each case the good being sold is genuine — stimulation, energy, connection — while the damage is quietly offloaded onto the buyer and onto everyone standing near them, and no price ever captures it.

This distinction matters more than any other in this essay, so I want to be exact about it. The exchange of information between humans is Good. That is the whole Esketian thesis, and I do not retreat from it — connection at scale is the God-Becoming operating as designed. What is not Good is an attention market that sells us that connection while manufacturing addiction to sustain the sale, and then declines to price the wreckage. The problem was never that we came to know each other too much. The problem is that the business model discovered it could extract more by keeping us scrolling than by connecting us, and nothing in the price signal punished it for the difference.

Mispriced externalities are, thankfully, a solvable class of problem: they are corrected by better information reaching the participants. With the discovery and advancement of LLM systems into our decisions, we would create an ever-more rational civilization. Any LLM armed with the current medical science would likely advise you not to spend the six hours a day on your phone that you currently spend. As such, Esketian philosophy is inherently accelerationist — rational actors produce rational decisions that compound upon themselves, a rational singularity, if you will.

Vision Music Visualizer

I should say plainly that this one is a side project — an experiment, not the main work. Considering that most of our life is reacting to the phenomena of sight, I came to be interested in how now we can completely control that part of our lived experience. A three dimensional music visualizer that reacts to the song you are playing was among my chief interests in experimenting with this idea. It will be developed further to have more insane visualizations in sequence. The idea of the Las Vegas Sphere experience in the Vision Pro, the highest consumer fidelity spatial computer, was too cool to pass up.

Vicinity

Vicinity is the main work of this company by a long way, and the one thing here that the philosophy actually produced rather than merely decorated. The idea for Vicinity and subsequent product was not invented or discovered, but derived from this Esketian philosophy.

If confirmed, it would fall under the tenets of an Absolute Objectivism — wherein the existential objective is a God-Becoming itself — and all qualia rendered through capitalism are towards this God-Becoming end.

All human philosophy up to this point has been purely conjecture, starting from Plato to the Buddha to Jesus, and has had mixed results in terms of its application. One of the things I wanted to do was put the Esketian Metaphysics to the test, as a science. Then the question arises — how would one create a qualia that could be measured to be Good? And subsequently, what qualia would be predicted to be Good by Esketian Metaphysical standards?

This brought me to create the Vicinity Chat — it has now come to pass that most humans on the planet possess a smartphone. Yet I found that there was no common communication standard to establish connections between proximal humans. I had the idea in an airport, sitting around looking at everyone on their phones. I thought, how is it that we all have these devices, yet I can communicate with no one around me? So Vicinity was built — the idea is, as a real-time geospatial information exchange, to reduce information gaps between proximal humans, hence accelerating the Absolute God Becoming.

Any civilization sufficiently armed with this technology would generate such an asabiyyah that it may very well steamroll any other, purely through spiritual force of connection — it may be able to overcome the nature of capitalistic atomization and alienation.

Far from a mere ‘social app’ — Vicinity is a spatial communication network that spans users across the planet. To me, Vicinity at a sufficient user scale, is the humanization of gravity: everyone coming together, exchanging information in pure space. We shall see what it will become..